Waterfalls
When should waterfall terms be reviewed by counsel before distributions?
Counsel should review when terms are ambiguous, side letters affect payments, reserves are discretionary, clawback risk exists, or material carry will be paid.1,2
Keep exploring
Legal review is most useful before money moves, when ambiguity can still be resolved through process and documentation. For sponsors, LP finance teams, administrators, and counsel reviewing distribution economics, the practical answer is to treat the question as part of distribution modeling, return thresholds, preferred return, catch-up, promote, reserves, true-up, and clawback review, not as a one-off definition. The record should show the governing agreement, proceeds schedule, capital accounts, waterfall model, reserve analysis, distribution notice, and approval record so an investor, lender, counsel, administrator, or operating lead can reconstruct the decision later. Ask counsel to review the distribution sequence, defined terms, approval rights, notice requirements, side letters, and any discretionary reserve decision. The common failure mode is treating the model as the legal answer and discovering after payment that the documents required a different allocation or notice process.1,2
Archstone
Operate your fund without a back office.
Related glossary terms
Related questions
What should be checked before running a distribution waterfall?
The team should check proceeds, capital accounts, return thresholds, preferred return, catch-up terms, reserves, fees, expenses, and document language.
How should sponsors explain a preferred return in investor materials?
They should explain the rate, compounding method, accrual period, payment priority, catch-up interaction, and whether unpaid amounts carry forward.
What is the difference between a catch-up and a promote split?
A catch-up reallocates distributions after the preferred return so the sponsor reaches an agreed share, while the promote split governs residual upside after that tier.
Related comparisons
LPAC vs Side Letter
LPAC is the governance forum; a side letter is the custom agreement. Both shape how investors interact with the sponsor. For sponsors, the decision affects governance, reporting cadence, and who owns execution risk.
Preferred Return vs Hurdle Rate
Preferred return and hurdle rate both define the return threshold LPs receive before the sponsor participates in upside. The distinction is usually structural rather than conceptual. For sponsors, the decision affects return thresholds, reporting cadence, and who owns execution risk.
Waterfall vs Promote
The waterfall defines distribution order. Promote defines the sponsor's share of upside inside that order. For sponsors, the decision affects sponsor economics, reporting cadence, and who owns execution risk.
Sources & References
- 1.Institutional Limited Partners AssociationCapital Call & Distribution Notice TemplateILPA(Capital call, distribution notice, LP reporting, and investor communication standards.)primary · workflow-standard · waterfalls
- 2.Internal Revenue ServicePartnershipsIRS(Partnership tax and reporting context for private vehicles.)primary · tax-context · waterfalls